This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 2045–2056, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.195
Figure 1: The optimized version of the transducer. The microheater resistive circuit width is 1200 µm (1.2 mm...
Figure 2: The optimized version of the transducer. The microheater resistive circuit width is 1200 µm (1.2 mm...
Figure 3: The masks for heater (a), electrode (b) and the fabricated transducer (c).
Figure 4: The Pt heater (green) and the Au interdigital electrode (blue) separate (a, b) and superimposed (c)...
Figure 5: Experimental setup for gas sensing measurements. Adapted from [35], copyright 2016, Elsevier Ltd. and T...
Figure 6: The sample holder/heating platform with the sensor inserted.
Figure 7: Cross-section of the sensing chamber – left to right: gas inlet, sample holder, thermocouple, gas o...
Figure 8: SEM images of the studied sensors (S1–S5). Gold interdigital electrodes appear as dark grey stripes....
Figure 9: 2D AFM image of S3 sensor.
Figure 10: Response of sensors S1–S5 (recorded in December 2015) to different concentrations of CO at their co...
Figure 11: S2 response (recorded in December 2015) to CO as a function of the working temperature.
Figure 12: Different composite sensor responses to relative humidity (62%).
Figure 13: Sensor cross-response (recorded in December 2015) to different concentrations of gases, at the corr...
Figure 14: Sensor response and recovery characteristics (recorded in June 2016) for sensor S2 at 300 °C, for d...
Figure 15: S2 response for different working temperatures.
Figure 16: S2 sensor response for different tested CO concentrations, under identical test conditions.